|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
   |
Posted - 2007.05.30 06:22:00 -
[1]
Great analysis. I completely agree, about the Guardian. I've spent the last 3 hours testing setups, with it. Its still 1000 times better than before, but it should be up to par with the other two.
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 07:15:00 -
[2]
I did notice one thing, however, just now. The Guardian's base cap recharge rate is about 15% better than the Onieros... basically as if it came with a Cap Recharger "built in". However it still has a total of 9 mid/low slots to the Guardians 7. Seems if the Guardian had 8 it would even the odds.
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 16:14:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Goumindong
Midslots = Cap Battery. Guardian benefits less from these. As well. they provide much more than 15% regen
Yeah, my setup is currently:
High: 4x'Solace' Reppers
Mid: Large Cap Battery II, Cap Recharger II
Low: Medium Armor Repper II, 2xCPR II's, 2xEANM
Rigs: 2x(Rig that increases cap amount, forget the name) -- will do the one that reduces remote repairer cap usage tonight, I didn't have rigging III last night.
Can run all day with 4 remotes, or 3 remotes and my medium. My setup is as if I were the only logistic ship, and I was at max range.
As for getting on a kill mail, I really do think helping-modules on someone in battle should get you on the kill mail. However, I fit a civilian gun and just take a shot at whatever is about to pop, haha. Now I can use some sentry drones or something, since 70k is a long way for some repair drones to go.
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.05.30 19:35:00 -
[4]
I feel even with the new changes, they may be in too much of a dangerous position. Only 75k from battle, you can still be taken out by something fast, or something with long range.
What do you guys think about a module that extends the range of remote modules? I would love to get the range up to the 150k range or even father if I sacrificed repping/transfer amount for range (it still needs to be balanced). You think it would be too powerful?
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 19:57:00 -
[5]
Yeah, after some more testing last night, it does seem a bit odd that two of the races ships have 2 more mid/low slots than the other two. Maybe the answer is to give one Midslot to the Guardian, a low slot to the Basilisk, and take away one from each of the Scythe and Oneiros for a high slot on each?
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.05.31 22:28:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Sanctus Maleficus
Yeah, after some more testing last night, it does seem a bit odd that two of the races ships have 2 more mid/low slots than the other two. Maybe the answer is to give one Midslot to the Guardian, a low slot to the Basilisk, and take away one from each of the Scythe and Oneiros for a high slot on each?
Just thought of... are tracking links mid-slot items? I'm at work, and its not int he item DB on the site here, hehe.
If so, it makes sense for the tracking-link ships to have extra midslots. However, when those extra midslots are used for cap regeneration, then those ships do infact have an advantage. Perhaps the real answer is that the tracking links need to be high slot items?
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.06.12 22:01:00 -
[7]
Im not 100% certain on the exact numbers, but I'm pretty sure that the shield transporters are more efficient on both cap and transfer amount than the remote armor reppers, so comparing 4 to 4 isn't really fair. Any numbskull could see that.
|
Sanctus Maleficus
Oberon Incorporated
Oberon Imperial Governance
|
Posted - 2007.06.13 20:40:00 -
[8]
Nian, do you realize that if you presented your points with respect and in a more constructive, instead of a condescending, manner, people might take you more seriously?
|
|
|
| |
|